Child Interstate Abortion Notification Bill Essay

This bill number H.R. 732 is co-sponsored by Roger Wicker, David Vitter, Pat Roberts, Jim Risch, Charles Grassley, Deborah Fischer, Mike Enzi, Bob Corker, Tom Coburn, Saxby Chambliss, Richard Burr, Roy Blunt and John Boozman. The bill was reintroduced by Senator Marco Rubio and Mitch McConnell, Senator Orrin Hatch (Hussey 2011). Child Interstate Abortion Notification Bill Essay. This is because, at the age below 18, the girl is considered to be a minor and the parents are required to make a decision regarding major medical operations. The same should apply in the case of abortion because it is a major undertaking and in some rare cases if a complication occurs it can cost the life of the child. This law would thus be protecting the parent and the young girls who with the parental knowledge may change their decision to carry out the abortion.
The related bill to the current bill is the Child Custody Protection Act of 2013. This act amends the code that prohibits the transportation of minors across states to obtain an abortion and makes an exception to when the procedure is crucial for saving the life of the minor.
The CIANA bill has passed in both the Senate and the house of Congress before. It was first introduced in 1998, then 1999 and 2002 and it was passed in both houses. It was again reintroduced in 2006 and 2006 when it was again passed in the two houses. Nevertheless, the recent bill which is now being reintroduced had died. Child Interstate Abortion Notification Bill Essay. However, the bill never passed and now it was reintroduced in both the current congress and senate and falls under the several legislation that has been enacted in relation to abortion and the protection of both the parent and the child’s right. Over 35 states already have the laws that require a parental consent before the abortion procedure is taken (United States 2005).

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

The “Child Interstate Abortion Notification Act,” or CIANA, imposes a mandatory parental notification and delay requirement on young women who seek abortion services outside of their home state. This would subject young women, abortion providers, and others who assist the women to a confusing maze of overlapping and con¬flicting state and federal laws — making it more difficult and more dangerous for young women to obtain abortions.

Said Nancy Northup, president and CEO of the Center for Reproductive Rights:

“We should be focused on helping teens avoid unintended pregnancies, not threatening to throw their trusted friends and family members behind bars for simply trying to help.

“While many young women do talk to their parents when considering an abortion, the reality is that some teens face abuse and abandonment. This bill would prevent young women from getting the care they need and ruin the lives of the people they turn to for help.” Child Interstate Abortion Notification Bill Essay.

CIANA fails to consider the reasons why a teen would turn to another adult like her grandmother or aunt for support, and could force young women to instead rely on an abusive caretaker, choose to travel alone or turn to unsafe alternatives to terminating her pregnancy.

Further, proposed law does not include any exception for threats to a young woman’s life or health, and imposes harsh civil and criminal liability on those who do help young women — with misdemeanor penalties that include up to a year in prison and fines of up to a $100,000.

Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-Fl.) introduced the bill last June. Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fl.) has introduced similar legislation in the Senate. Child Interstate Abortion Notification Bill Essay.