As discussed by Melnyk et al., independent review is required to prevent potential conflicts of interest and human rights violations. Give an example of a potential conflict of interest or human rights violation that could be prevented with independent review.
Q2: Refer to your PICOT question and page 658 in the textbook. Formulate an abstract for a grant proposal for funding of your PICOT project. This should be brief and only about 5-10 sentences in length total. Remember write directly and to the point. Include areas that discuss:
1. the clinical significance
2. the study aim/hypothesis/or study question (this could be your PICOT question clearly defining the P, I, C, O, and T)
3. the theoretical framework or your EBP model and how it relates to your study
4. the design, methods, sample population, outcome variable, and intervention
5. your approach to the analysis of the data – or – how you would want to analyze the comparative data
MY PICOT question: in older adult patients with total hip replacements (P), is early ambulation within 12-24 hours of surgery effective (I) compared to just routine DVT prophylaxis (C) in reducing the risk of developing post operative DVTs (Outcome) within the first three days post surgery (T)?  Critical Appraisal of Research Essay Paper

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Evidence-Based Project, Part 3: Critical Appraisal of Research

Conflicts of interest and human right violation are key issues across the globe that should be given much weight to ensure the safety of all people across the globe (Peisah et al., 2020). To ensure the interest of individuals are safe guarded across the globe, they should be judged accordingly with proper evidence being provided for the decision made by the individuals in charge as this will ensure that the ethical consideration are applied when ensuring that justice prevail in the issues being addressed as long as it involves ethical issues in different areas. The evidence must cover several areas which are being considered ethical as this will also lead to proper verdict being given. There must also be evidence that indicates the ethical issue being addressed was approved and implemented by certain body which has the power to sanction and approve bill. The evidence provided must be considered by a certain group of the existing generation if not the entire generation. Example of human right violation is modern sex trafficking among both genders which hinders human rights and puts the in danger. This can be solved by independent review of the law guiding human rights. Critical Appraisal of Research Essay Paper

My PICOT question is should total hip replacement be done to older people? The patient in this research are the older women who have gone under total hip replacement (Zavala-González et al., 2022). The intervention that can be given to them is by ensuring that they have an individual looking at them at giving them wheel chair as this may help them. The significance of the surgery is to ensure they avoid hip pain and they have enhanced proper movement. The comparison should be based on what changes will occur when the hip surgery is done and what consequences can be put into consideration if the negative impacts are more to impact the outcome then the surgery should not be done as the outcome should be positive.

References

Peisah, C., Byrnes, A., Doron, I. (., Dark, M., & Quinn, G. (2020). Advocacy for the human rights of older people in the COVID pandemic and beyond: A call to mental health professionals. International Psychogeriatrics, 32(10), 1199-1204. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1041610220001076

Zavala-González, J., Martínez, D., & Gutiérrez-Espinoza, H. (2022). Effectiveness of adding virtual reality to physiotherapeutic treatment in patients with total hip arthroplasty. A randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation, 36(5), 660-668. https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155221080546

Critical Appraisal of Research Essay Paper