I agree with the aforementioned statement.

Behaviorism is an intellectual way of thinking that stresses conduct as opposed to contemplations, sentiments, or inspirations. Behaviorism, which traces all the way back to the mid 20th century, keeps on influencing current brain science, with behaviorist ideas going all through favor at regular intervals. The investigation of behaviorism acquired reputation through the tests and promotion of B.F. Skinner. Skinner accepts that, even though people and creatures have a few personalities, considerations, and sentiments, it is difficult to acquire information on this inner world, which is the reason centering on conduct would be a more useful cycle.

References:

Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2020). Applied behavior analysis (3rd ed.). Pearson.

Discussion: Behaviorism

Photo Credit: Vitezslav Vylicil – stock.adobe.com

One skill of an applied behavior analyst is collaborating to identify negative behaviors an individual is exhibiting and then developing treatments for those behaviors (e.g., strategies, interventions, etc.) to help them change the behaviors and derive improved outcomes for themselves. Radical behaviorism posits there is a science of behavior that has shown the environment as a significant cause of behavior and that experiential factors play a primary role in determining behavior (Cooper et al., 2020). The strategies and interventions of the applied behavior analyst represent efforts to change maladaptive behavior by systematically employing techniques that control circumstances in which negative behaviors arise and helping individuals learn and apply new skills.

For example, if a child in a classroom is repeatedly leaving their seat during instruction (i.e., maladaptive behavior), an applied behavior analyst would work with the child to identify the factors contributing to the maladaptive behavior and then develop strategies or interventions to generate more appropriate behavior by the child.

For this week’s Discussion, you will consider your perspectives on radical behaviorism and its learning principles.

Reference:
Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2020). Applied behavior analysis (3rd ed.). Pearson.

To Prepare

Review the Learning Resources for this week as well as the required weekly media program to gain an understanding of radical behaviorism.
Think about whether you concur with the learning principles of radical behaviorism.

By Day 4 of Week 3

Post an explanation of whether you agree or disagree with the following statement, and why or why not:

Skinner’s “radical behaviorism” proposes that behavior, rather than cognitive processes, should be the primary topic of study.

Read your colleagues’ postings.

Note: For this discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the To Participate in this Discussion link, then select Create Thread to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Submit!

By Day 6 of Week 3

Respond to at least two colleagues’ posts by expanding on each colleague’s rationale for why they agree or disagree with Skinner’s proposal. Justify your response.

Be sure to support your posts and responses with specific references to behavior-analytic theory and research. In addition to the Learning Resources, search the Walden Library and/or internet for peer-reviewed articles to support your posts and responses. Use proper APA format and citations, including those in the Learning Resources.

Return to this Discussion in a few days to read the responses to your initial posting. Note what you have learned and/or any insights that you have gained because of your colleagues’ comments.

I agree with the statement, Skinner’s “radical behaviorism” proposes that behavior, rather than cognitive processes, should be the primary topic of study. Skinner did not have the same ideals concerning behavior as his peers and predecessors about definitions of “unobservable mediating terms, inferred constructs, validation, theory testing, and so on” (Moore, J., 2011). Skinner created the philosophy of science underlying behavior analysis and called it radical behaviorism. Similar to Watson, Skinner considered behavior is a subject matter in its own right. A behavioral event is how the subject is acting and the “features of the surrounding environmental circumstances with respect to which it is acting” (Moore, J., 2011). Skinner was opposed to the ideal of mentalism. Mentalism is defined as the “appeal to causes of behavior from other dimensions (e.g., neural, mental, cognitive, psychic, conceptual, mystical, transcendental) in an explanation of behavior” (Moore, J., 2011). According to Skinner, “mental talk” in traditional psychology does not occur because of the influence of phenomena from the mental dimension, but because of a wide variety of other extraneous influences. “Radical behaviorists argue that the mental talk is to be rejected because it is manifestly counterproductive: It diverts attention away from, and therefore interferes with, the analysis of functional relations between behavior and environmental variables” (Moore, J., 2011).

Moore, J. (2011). Behaviorism. The Psychological Record, 61(3), 449-463. DOI: 10.1007/BF03395771