Nursing Informatics Essay Paper

In a 4- to 5-page paper, synthesize the peer-reviewed research you reviewed. Format your Assignment as an Annotated Bibliography. Be sure to address the following:

Identify the 4 peer-reviewed research articles you reviewed, citing each in APA format.
Summarize each study, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described. Be specific and provide examples.
In your conclusion, synthesize the findings from the 4 peer-reviewed research articles

Nursing Informatics

The benefits of health technologies being integrated into clinical systems has long been established even as new technologies are being leveraged to improve patient safety and care efficiency while reducing costs to present a complete and more proactive care. However, there is a lack of practical knowledge on how to link the clinical effectiveness of the new health technologies to return on investment and return on investment that has slowed down the adoption of these technologies. For health care to evolve and move forwards, these new technologies must be successfully adopted with organizations sharing failures and successes, learning from the failures and successes collectively, avoiding repeating mistakes, and saving human lives, costs and time (Lau & Kuziemsky, 2016). The present paper offers an analysis of four current journal articles identified to inform the subject of how clinical systems have impacted the outcomes and efficiencies within the context of nursing practice and health care delivery.

Article 1.

Islam, M., Poly, T., & Li, Y. (2018). Recent Advancement of Clinical Information Systems: Opportunities and Challenges. Yearbook of Medical Informatics, 27(1), 83-90. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1667075

This is an eight-page journal article that explores the opportunities and challenges most commonly perceived in clinical information systems. The authors note that clinical information systems have been particularly useful for improving workflow and patient care although these improvements are relative. However, they explain that the benefits that can be realized from these systems are being overshadowed by a lack of functionality that creates data exchange, management and integration challenges. Towards this end, the study applied a secondary research approach that evaluated publications from medical publication databases. The identified publications were reviewed, synthesized and summarized to describe the current stage of the clinical information systems with the intention of assessing the current state of knowledge while identifying the associated challenges and benefits. The results of the literature review determined that clinical information systems can support evidence-based practices, and this incidentally improve efficacy of care, quality and patient safety. It is for these reasons that the adaptability, acceptability and advancement of clinical information systems have increased. Although the demand for the functionality of the systems is increasing, there is are data integration challenges as well as lack of functionality to exchange medical information that hinder the systems. Nursing Informatics Essay Paper  It becomes clear that although these systems have much value, there are organizational, human and technical factors that limit their value. The authors conclude that although clinical information systems improve care efficiency and workflows to boost overall health care quality. This article is useful for showing that clinical information systems present an opportunity for reducing clinical errors, such as diagnostic and medication errors, and can support medical personnel to present up-to-date health information. Besides that, the three authors have significant experience in medical research as indicated by their qualifications thus indicating that they can be trusted to offer objective information. They are forthcoming with the research approach thus improving its value. Overall, the article is useful for informing the subject of how clinical systems have impacted the outcomes and efficiencies within the context of nursing practice and health care delivery.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Article 2.

Sitting, D., Wright, A., Coiera, E., Magrabi, F., Ratwani, R., Bates, D., & Singh, H. (2018). Current challenges in health information technology–related patient safety. Health Informatics Journal, 26(1), 181-189. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458218814893

This is a nine-page journal article that identifies the challenges in the use of health information technology, specifically the challenges that are linked to patient safety. The authors acknowledge that health information technology has high potential for improving care within complex adaptive health systems. However, they introduce new challenges and consequences with the more significant challenge being safety in the clinical settings. The study identifies nine significant challenges. The first challenge is how to conduct an effective risk assessment since the nature of these technologies are unique and require new assessment tools, methods and models to be developed. The second challenge is that the many technologies present different user interfaces that different across the technologies. There is a need to develop standard user interface design functions and features. The third challenge is that the software that powers these technologies present technology concerns especially when considering their interface and network capabilities that present opportunities for hackers. The fourth challenge is how to unambiguously identify the patients while conforming with information privacy and confidentiality expectations. The fifth challenge is how to develop and implement a decision support system to improve safety. The sixth challenge is how to identify practices for safely managing transitions between information technology systems. The seventh challenge is how to develop real-time methods for enabling automated surveillance and monitoring of system safety and performance. The eighth challenge is how to establish a culture and legal framework for sharing information about adverse events and hazards. The final challenge is how to develop method and models for safely improving health information technology. The nine challenges are identified as important controls that must be in place to ensure that health information technology delivers on its promise of patient safety. The article is useful for exploring the impact of health technology on nursing practice and health care delivery.

Article 3.

Kim, M., Coiera, E., & Magrabi, F. (2017). Problems with health information technology and their effects on care delivery and patient outcomes: a systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 24(2), 246-250. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocw154

This is a five-page journal article that explores the effects of information technology on health care and their effects on patient outcomes and care delivery. Towards this end, the authors applied a secondary research approach that reviewed publications from medical publication databases. Based on the literature review approach, the study identified 34 publications that explored the research topic. Firstly, the study identified poor user interfaces and use error as factors that interfered with information receipt and led to decision-making errors. Secondly, the authors determine that clinical errors from medications are a significant concern. Thirdly, the article identified system functionality as a concern with the use of health technologies, to include delayed care delivery, fragmented displays, and user interfaces. Finally, issues with software updates, system configuration and system access are noted to delay care delivery. The five reported problems are linked to patient harm and death, as well as near miss events. This article is useful for exploring the problems with health technology with regards to risks to patient safety. The study is largely qualitative having applied a systematic approach, and this may limit the value of its results with results to how current the results are. Still, the authors are academicians and this improves the value of the study as they can be trusted to present an objective study. Overall, the study is well researched and descriptive thus making it useful for informing the subject of how clinical systems have impacted the outcomes and efficiencies within the context of nursing practice and health care delivery.

Article 4.

McCullough, M., & Goodin, K. (2016). Clinical Data Systems to Support Public Health Practice: A National Survey of Software and Storage Systems Among Local Health Departments. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 22, S18-S26. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000000443

This is a nine-page journal article that explores how clinical data systems have been applied to support health care practice. It acknowledges that these systems are increasingly being adopted by health care organizations as software and data storage systems. The systems are being leveraged to improve medical practice. To explore this topic, the researchers evaluated the systems applied by local health departments. Towards this end, it was determined that 38.4% of departments make use of electronic health records. The use of technology was linked to coverage areas for the organization with those that serve large populations more likely to make use of health information technologies. In addition, it notes that although medical organizations are adopting health information technologies, 28.9% of clinical data and 59.4% of non-clinical data are managed in paper records. The study makes it clear that medical organizations are increasingly making use of health information technologies to store clinical data. Significant challenges to the use of technologies focus on the technology characteristics that include existing informatics capabilities, service portfolio, governance, and size of the organization. This journal article is useful for exploring the unique characteristics of clinical systems and their impact on outcomes and efficiencies within the context of nursing practice and health care delivery.

New technology—and the application of existing technology—only appears in healthcare settings after careful and significant research. The stakes are high, and new clinical systems need to offer evidence of positive impact on outcomes or efficiencies.

Nurse informaticists and healthcare leaders formulate clinical system strategies. As these strategies are often based on technology trends, informaticists and others have then benefited from consulting existing research to inform their thinking.

In this Assignment, you will review existing research focused on the application of clinical systems. After reviewing, you will summarize your findings.

To Prepare:

• Review the Resources and reflect on the impact of clinical systems on outcomes and efficiencies within the context of nursing practice and healthcare delivery.
• Conduct a search for recent (within the last 5 years) research focused on the application of clinical systems. The research should provide evidence to support the use of one type of clinical system to improve outcomes and/or efficiencies, such as “the use of personal health records or portals to support patients newly diagnosed with diabetes.”
• Identify and select 4 peer-reviewed research articles from your research.

The Assignment: (4-5 pages)

In a 4- to 5-page paper, synthesize the peer-reviewed research you reviewed. Format your Assignment as an Annotated Bibliography. Be sure to address the following:

• Identify the 4 peer-reviewed research articles you reviewed, citing each in APA format.
• Summarize each study, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described. Be specific and provide examples.
• In your conclusion, synthesize the findings from the 4 peer-reviewed research articles

In a 4- to 5-page paper, synthesize the peer-reviewed research you reviewed. Format your Assignment as an Annotated Bibliography. Be sure to address the following:

·   Properly identify 4 peer-reviewed research articles you reviewed.
·   Summarize each study, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described. Be specific and provide examples.
In your conclusion, synthesize the findings from the 4 peer-reviewed research articles.—

Excellent 77 (77%) – 85 (85%)

The responses accurately and clearly identify 4 peer-reviewed research articles for the Assignment.

The responses accurately and thoroughly summarize in detail each study reviewed, explaining in detail the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described.

Specific, accurate, and detailed examples are provided which fully support the responses.

Good 68 (68%) – 76 (76%)

The responses identify 4 peer-reviewed research articles for the Assignment.

The responses summarize each study reviewed, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described.

Accurate examples are provided which support the responses provided.

Fair 60 (60%) – 67 (67%)

The responses vaguely or inaccurately identify 4 or less peer-reviewed articles for the Assignment.

The responses summarize each study reviewed, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described that is vague or inaccurate.

Examples provided to support the responses are vague or inaccurate.

Poor 0 (0%) – 59 (59%)

The responses vaguely and inaccurately identify less than 4 peer-reviewed articles for the Assignment, or are missing.

The responses vaguely and inaccurately summarize each study reviewed, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described, or are missing.

Examples provided to support the responses are vague and inaccurate, or are missing.

Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:

Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.—

Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.

Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.

Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:

Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation—

Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.  Nursing Informatics Essay Paper