Qualitative Research
There are significant benefits to using qualitative studies over quantitative studies. While quantitative studies provide a statistical base of casual or correlative data, qualitative research gives a highly detailed and personal account of the experiences of different individuals. Symbolically and conceptually, the findings from qualitative studies are useful in that they increase the level of understanding that nurses have about the experiences of patients thus allowing them to develop more tailored interventions in their care together with the ability to anticipate problems that could be faced by a patient is a specific context (Vretare and Anderzen-Carlsson, 2020).
It is worth noting that qualitative research has the controls needed for generating results that are useful to the nursing knowledge base. Literature suggests that the contributions given by qualitative research continues to grow and that it does advance nursing knowledge. This is especially the case when it comes to some aspects of the knowledge in question. This therefore implies that it is important that all nurses that are in practice understand this form of research and can judge it’s worth while also relating it to their development of care plans. Knowledge claims that originate from qualitative studies need to be open to formal evaluation and critique. The implication of this is that the need for qualitative research to be open to audit, searching and criticism remains. This is how its contribution can be assessed (Vretare and Anderzen-Carlsson, 2020).
Qualitative studies have the ability to provide a firsthand documentation of patient experiences. It can also provide suggestions for how improvements to patient safety can be made. Finally, it provides the ability to detect some of the more common desires and concerns that are associated with quality of care. Qualitative Research Essay Example
Reference
Vretare, L. L., & Anderzen-Carlsson, A. (2020). The critical care nurse’s perception of handover: a phenomenographic study. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, 58, 102807.
Excellent | Proficient | Basic | Needs Improvement | ||
Prepares an argument to either support or refute the claim qualitative research has the same rigor and adherence to objective standards as quantitative studies. Explains whether qualitative research does or does not have the controls needed to generate the results that contribute to the nursing knowledge base. Explains if qualitative research could be used to investigate the patient safety problem identified in Week 1. | 18 (36%) – 20 (40%)
Initial post is exceptional containing well developed and insightful analysis that brings connections to nursing practice into the discussion. |
16 (32%) – 17 (34%)
Initial post contains reasonable analysis that brings insight into the discussion. |
14 (28%) – 15 (30%)
Initial post contains minimal analysis that brings limited insight into the discussion. |
0 (0%) – 13 (26%)
Initial post lacks analysis and/or that brings little or no insight into the discussion. |
|
Entered the discussion thread on 3 separate days. Wrote at least two posts to two separate peers. Responses are appropriate to the topic, substantive, and promoted discussion by one or more of the following:
• contributing insight to move the discussion forward • offering substantial and/or different points of view and asks questions to add to discussion • including extra references or websites for peers to consider • relating discussion to different areas of practice and applying concepts to practice **Additional points may be deducted for late posting per the University late policy. |
14 (28%) – 15 (30%)
Response posts add substantive ideas and perspectives that invite further analysis and discussion. Participated 3 or more days in the classroom and responded to more than 2 classmates. |
12 (24%) – 13 (26%)
Response posts are proficient and provide adequate analysis and discussion. Participated 3 days in the classroom and responds to at least two classmates. |
11 (22%) – 11 (22%)
Response posts are limited and provide minimal analysis and discussion. Participated less than 3 days in the classroom and/or responds to less than two classmates. |
0 (0%) – 10 (20%)
Response posts are inadequate and provide no analysis of discussion and/ or there is no participation in the classroom. |
|
Professional Writing: Clarity, Flow, and Organization | 4.5 (9%) – 5 (10%)
Content is free from spelling, punctuation, and grammar/syntax errors. Writing demonstrates very well-formed sentence and paragraph structure. Content presented is completely clear, logical, and well-organized. |
4 (8%) – 4 (8%)
Content contains minor spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors. Writing demonstrates appropriate sentence and paragraph structure. Content presented is mostly clear, logical, and well-organized. |
3.5 (7%) – 3.5 (7%)
Content contains moderate spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors. Writing demonstrates adequate sentence and paragraph structure and may require some editing. Content presented is adequately clear, logical, and/or organized, but could benefit from additional editing/revision. |
0 (0%) – 3 (6%)
Content contains significant spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors. Writing does not demonstrate adequate sentence and paragraph structure and requires additional editing/proofreading. Key sections of presented content lack clarity, logical flow, and/or organization. |
|
Professional Writing: Context, Audience, Purpose, and Tone | 4.5 (9%) – 5 (10%)
Content clearly demonstrates awareness of context, audience, and purpose. Tone is highly professional, scholarly, and free from bias, and style is appropriate for the professional setting/workplace context. |
4 (8%) – 4 (8%)
Content demonstrates satisfactory awareness of context, audience, and purpose. Tone is adequately professional, scholarly, and/or free from bias, and style is consistent with the professional setting/workplace context. |
3.5 (7%) – 3.5 (7%)
Content demonstrates basic awareness of context, audience, and purpose. Tone is somewhat professional, scholarly, and/or free from bias, and style is mostly consistent with the professional setting/workplace context. |
0 (0%) – 3 (6%)
Content minimally or does not demonstrate awareness of context, audience, and/or purpose. Writing is not reflective of professional/scholarly tone and/or is not free of bias. Style is inconsistent with the professional setting/workplace context and reflects the need for additional editing. |
|
Professional Writing: Originality, Source Credibility, and Attribution of Ideas | 4.5 (9%) – 5 (10%)
Content reflects original thought and writing and proper paraphrasing. Writing demonstrates full adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references. |
4 (8%) – 4 (8%)
Content adequately reflects original writing and paraphrasing. Writing demonstrates adequate adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references. |
3.5 (7%) – 3.5 (7%)
Content somewhat reflects original writing and paraphrasing. Writing somewhat demonstrates adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references. |
0 (0%) – 3 (6%)
Content does not adequately reflect original writing and/or paraphrasing. Writing demonstrates inconsistent adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and reference. |
|
Total Points: 50 |
Discussion: Basic Characteristics of Qualitative Research
As a nursing professional, you will likely engage in research for your health care setting. Depending on the research question you seek to address, you might choose to use a qualitative research design. Understanding when and why it is appropriate to choose a qualitative research design will be important as you develop research skills for nursing practice. As you continue throughout this course, think about what considerations you should keep in mind when choosing to engage in qualitative research. In what ways might qualitative research be more preferred than quantitative research for informing nursing practice?
For this Discussion, be sure to review the qualitative article by Vretare and Anderzen-Carlsson (2020). Then, view this week’s Qualitative Research Design PowerPoint webinar that describes each step of the qualitative research process and different approaches used to conduct qualitative research.
By Day 3
You will need to prepare and post a 350-word response that addresses the following:
Note: Post a three paragraph (at least 350 words) response directly in the response text box rather than as an attachment. Be sure to use evidence, in-text citations, and essay-level writing skills, including the use of transitional material and organizational frames. Use the writing resources to develop your post.
By Day 7
Read two or more of your colleagues’ postings from the Discussion question.
Respond to two or more of your colleagues with a comment that asks for clarification, provides support for, or contributes additional information.
Post a Discussion entry on 3 different days of the week. See the Discussion Rubrics for more information.
Submission and Grading Information
Grading Criteria
To access your Rubric:
Week 4 Discussion Rubric
Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 7
Qualitative Research Essay Example