Using qualitative and quantitative methods to evaluate outcomes in research

Outcomes evaluation in an evidence based research is an essential practice that enhances the researchers to synthesize their findings. According to Oliver et al (2019), the main aim of evidence based practice implementation in a clinical practice is to impact some of the major changes in healthcare. Both qualitative and quantitative research in evidence based practice helps to identify the standard practices that can help in evaluating the outcomes of patients. A combination of both qualitative and quantitative methods in a single research plays an important role through making sure that the disadvantages of one method balance with the merits of the other.  This combination of the two methods helps the researcher to gain more understanding of topic being studied. Through the qualitative analysis, research findings and outcomes in form of presentations such as images are well analyzed. The quantitative analysis helps to achieve quality outcomes in form of numbers.  Using qualitative and quantitative methods to evaluate outcomes in research

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

The other benefit of evaluating the role of outcomes in an evidence based research is improving the quality of care through offering the best treatments to the patients in concern. Evidence based practice evaluation also enhances reduction of treatment costs incurred by patients (Dang & Dearholt, 2018). Through the evaluation of both qualitative and quantitative outcomes, the best therapeutic approaches are determined. The evaluation also helps to identify the treatments according to the proper quantity that a patient should take. The other benefit of evidence based practice evaluation is ensuring that all healthcare organizations concerned adopt the best healthcare practices thus improving the quality of care to patients.

References

Dang, D., & Dearholt, S. (2018). Supplemental materials for Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-

Based Practice: Model and Guidelines. Sigma Theta Tau International.

http://hdl.handle.net/10755/17100

Oliver, K., Kothari, A., & Mays, N. (2019). The dark side of coproduction: do the costs outweigh

the benefits for health research?. Health research policy and systems, 17(1), 1-10.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0432-3

Using qualitative and quantitative methods to evaluate outcomes in research